Our Hypothesis, considering Steubenville water's reputation, was not too far off. We expected to see considerable bacteria growth, and we did. Our sample had some of the most growth in the class. We examined it in detail under a microscope to determine its characteristics. From what we could see, the colonies were circular, with a cream/tan pigmentation, the edges were smooth (entire), and the elevation of the colony was slightly raised.

Next, we looked to our broth culture to see if there was any bacterial growth, and what kind. At first, it appeared as though nothing had cultivated in the broth, but when we flicked the bottom of it, a flurry of particles flared up. This meant, obviously, that they had been cultivated as a sediment, and were resting at the bottom of the tube.

Finally, we examined the slant cultures. Significant bacterial growth had occurred in the slants, and they had spread out from the original source of inoculation. In both slants, the bacteria seemed to develop pointed edges, indicating an echinulate sample.



In the last section of the lab, we prepared a bacterial smear and performed a simple stain. Smearing a sample of our agar plate culture onto a slide, we allowed it to air dry, then passed it quickly through the flame a few times to heat fix it. We then covered it with crystal violet stain for about 30 seconds before rinsing it off. Finally, we blotted any water from the slide using bibulous paper, and examined it under a microscope. This time, however, we used a blue light filter on the microscope to show better contrast. Comparatively, we got a much clearer image.

No comments:
Post a Comment